Results of camera evaluations

Well, I’ve uploaded QT files of all the cameras in HD and all the ones shot RAW in UHD as well.

They can be downloaded in their full unaltered by Vimeo form as well.

So how are people viewing them?

So far 606 total idiots have viewed them on their smartphones!

Unsurprisingly the Ursa Mini-Pro and the Canon C200 are the most popular however they also have the highest number of not completed viewings.

People viewing the evaluations via CML watch the videos to the end and tend to watch them at higher resolutions and download the original files far more than people going in directly to Vimeo or via other sites.

Why start viewing a camera evaluation if you’re going to give up after the first few exposures? one camera I can understand, you didn’t realise what was involved but the same person doing this on camera after camera? what kind of person does this, certainly not anyone who knows anything about cinematography. Anyway, WTF are you doing viewing them on a smartphone?

I will still go ahead and upload some EXR’s for the people who understand what their doing, precious few though it is!

2 Replies to “Results of camera evaluations”

  1. Hello,
    Can u make an explenation how we must watch it? I’m a newby but I like to understand it and learn something. We can’t all already know hoe to watch and interpret this….
    Thanks

  2. The best way is to click on download from Vimeo and then download the original files. They’re large files but they will give you the best result.
    Second, watch them on a large computer screen in the highest resolution you can, 2160 is best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

nine + 16 =