{"id":224,"date":"2018-06-21T10:17:12","date_gmt":"2018-06-21T08:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/?p=224"},"modified":"2018-06-21T10:21:41","modified_gmt":"2018-06-21T08:21:41","slug":"the-next-camera-evaluations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/2018\/06\/21\/the-next-camera-evaluations\/","title":{"rendered":"The next camera evaluations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In preparation for the next round of camera evaluations I asked for comments and got a lot regarding the type of charts I was using.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about this and I think we may have it all backwards.<\/p>\n<p>Conventional rec 709 TV has a DR of at most 6 stops and if the charts are slavishly adhered to only 5 stops.<\/p>\n<p>However, once the knees and hypergammas etc are taken into account we are actually working with 8 stops at least.<\/p>\n<p>10 bit log-c will contain about 11.5 stops of DR and that&#8217;s more than the best available domestically HDR sets can handle.<\/p>\n<p>Of course that limitation isn&#8217;t the camera, it&#8217;s the record format and that&#8217;s why I record RAW for these tests with a few odd exceptions that are forced on me like rendering 6K to 4K before recording.<\/p>\n<p>So what are the tests trying to do?<\/p>\n<p>I think that we, or I, have lost focus on this.<\/p>\n<p>The tests are to find out what the usable DR of the cameras is.<br \/>\nTo establish where the highlights actually begin to clip.<br \/>\nTo see what colour distortions appear with exposure change.<br \/>\nTo see if there are motion artifacts created by the cameras.<br \/>\nTo check what happens to skintone with the different cameras and different lighting.<br \/>\nI acknowledge that I can&#8217;t check all lighting and camera combinations, although this would be a really useful experiment.<\/p>\n<p>This is why I created the stress test chart, it&#8217;s not designed to show how a camera reacts to rec 709 conditions, it&#8217;s designed to see how far a camera can be pushed until it breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THAT<\/strong> is what I&#8217;m interested in, it&#8217;s the kind of information that will affect how I shoot and what I use.<\/p>\n<p>Just as ACES is designed to work regardless of output space, that can be changed later, so the CML tests will be conducted regardless of any &#8220;Standards&#8221;. We will try and establish the limitations of the cameras.<br \/>\nOf course some of you will only ever see those results within the limitations of a 709 or sRGB environment. They will at least show you what happens within that environment.<\/p>\n<p>For those who want more I will make available both EXR&#8217;s in 16 bit ACES and, eventually, the original camera files.<\/p>\n<p>I am now working out how to get the most information out of these evaluations. Part of this will be using a &#8220;standard&#8221; tungsten light source, the old fashioned kind that creates light by burning something \ud83d\ude42 It will also involve charts lit at different levels within the one shot.<br \/>\nWhich charts is another matter!<br \/>\nI&#8217;m leaning towards a CML stress Test and a Macbeth on either side of the frame, one side lit &#8220;normally&#8221; and one side 3 stops over. In the middle will be a Kodak grey scale plus card as this has been my reference for a very long time. A movement test will be below the Kodak chart. If I can get a small CDM chart then I will probably squeeze it in below the Kodak chart just for the traditionalists. Oh and a CamBelles chart will feature somewhere \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>I will also try and do some comparisons between faces lit with tungsten and LED light. This will include the DSC VFX chart.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In preparation for the next round of camera evaluations I asked for comments and got a lot regarding the type of charts I was using. I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about this and I think we may have it all backwards. Conventional rec 709 TV has a DR of at most 6 stops and if &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/2018\/06\/21\/the-next-camera-evaluations\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The next camera evaluations&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cameras"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8PwMD-3C","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":226,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224\/revisions\/226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}