{"id":238,"date":"2018-07-30T10:46:26","date_gmt":"2018-07-30T08:46:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/?p=238"},"modified":"2020-04-05T08:42:37","modified_gmt":"2020-04-05T06:42:37","slug":"personal-comments-on-the-2018-cml-camera-evaluations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/2018\/07\/30\/personal-comments-on-the-2018-cml-camera-evaluations\/","title":{"rendered":"Personal comments on the 2018 CML camera evaluations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I want to stress that these are purely personal impressions and that you should check out the raw files at\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/index.html\">https:\/cinematography.net<\/a>\u00a0 and also get your hands on a camera to see how it feels for you before making any decisions.<br \/>When we were shooting we used an Odyssey and a Canon 24&#8243; monitor to see what we were doing.<\/p>\n<p>In all cases the EI mentioned is what was required to give a &#8220;correct&#8221; &amp; neutral picture in Resolve with no tweaking. Highlight response is the point where the small grey square within the white square on the CML chart disappears.\u00a0 Shadow level is where I find the noise to be unacceptable beyond this point.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Alexa Mini<\/strong>: Ours came with open gate and raw licenses and an Amira V\/F, it fired up quickly and had very clear and easy menus.<\/p>\n<p>I would rate this camera at an EI of 1000 with a highlight latiude of 5 stops but the shadows only give 2 stops. I&#8217;d set the camera too EI 800 and my meter to EI 320-400 to get the best compromise between highlights and noise. DR beyond the charts is 7 stops.<br \/>Note:- Bear in mind that yellow clips a little before any other colour.<\/p>\n<p><strong>BMD Ursa MP<\/strong>: We didn&#8217;t have the V\/F for this and used the swing out monitor that is built in, it fired up quickly and had a very clear and easy to use menu.<\/p>\n<p>I would rate this camera at EI 800 with a highlight latitude of 3.5 stops and a shadow level of 2 stops. I&#8217;d set the camera to EI 800 and my meter to EI 500 to get the best results from this camera. DR beyond charts is 5.5 stops.<br \/>Note: Yellow again clips earlier than other colours.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Canon C200<\/strong>: We used the touch screen V\/F that comes with the camera, it fired up quickly but the menus do take some getting used to! There&#8217;s a lot there but it&#8217;s not all easy to find.<\/p>\n<p>I would rate this camera at EI 800 with a highlight latitude of 3.5 stops and shadows of 2.5 stops.<br \/>I&#8217;d set the camera to EI 800 and my meter to EI 500 to get the best results from this camera. DR is 6 stops beyond the charts.<br \/>Note: Once again yellow clips earlier than other colours.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Canon C700 FF<\/strong> 6K to 4K in camera: We had the full V\/F on this and it&#8217;s a lovely one \ud83d\ude42 the menu system was a little easier to use. Recording to XF-AVC internally was easy but recording the RAW output to 6K and 4K relied on using an external Codex recorder which results in a camera that is too big and ungainly to use. No issues with startup time. We had all the usual issues licensing the Codex reader, it shouldn&#8217;t be this hard. I think Canon really missed a trick here by not releasing a FF camera that included the raw recording from the C200.<\/p>\n<p>I would rate the camera at EI 500 with a highlight latitude of 3.5 stops and shadows of 3.5 stops.<br \/>DR is 7 stops beyond the charts.<br \/>I&#8217;d set the camera to 800 and my meter to 500 to get the best from this camera.<br \/>Note: Again yellow clips early.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fuji X-H1<\/strong>: I&#8217;m not going to comment on the V\/F, it&#8217;s a DSLR&#8230;same for the menus \ud83d\ude42 lots of them but if you&#8217;re a DSLR user they make sense! we used flog recording at 200Mbps the best it can do and although I&#8217;m not impressed with the amount of sharpening and NR that was present in the standard setting it is possible to reduce these considerably and I&#8217;m experimenting with this at the moment.<\/p>\n<p>I would rate this camera at EI 1000 with a highlight latitude of 3 stops and shadow limit of 2 stops (see notes). DR 5 stops beyond the charts.<br \/>I&#8217;d set the camera to 800 and my meter to 500 to get the best from this camera.<br \/>Note: this camera clips hard in the yellow and red well below the 3 stop point so be careful.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Kinefinity Mavo<\/strong>: it fires up pretty quickly but some of the menus are very confusing, separate settings for EI and ISO?? It&#8217;s not ready for general consumption yet, they need to get their post workflow sorted. When they do it could be a very good camera.<\/p>\n<p>I would rate the camera at EI 800 with a highlight latitude of 4 stops, I&#8217;m not sure what the shadow latitude is because of post issues but it looks like it could be very good indeed.<br \/>Note: I haven&#8217;t been able to do a full and good assessment of this camera or the Terra because of the post workflow issues.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Kodak 5219<\/strong>: Checking on a few things about the scans before I post but by far the best highlight latitude of anything we tested, about 6 stops, but that&#8217;s where our tests ran out, it could be more. I&#8217;d rate it at EI 320 to get the best from it but that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve found with all film stocks. They respond well to 2\/3rds over.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panasonic Varicam<\/strong>:\u00a0 I asked for a Pure and got a V35 with a Codex recorder added to the back, nightmare of a huge ungainly camera, the Pure solves this. A clear and sensible menu system. Once again the Codex system proved difficult. It may be wonderful with a specialist DIT but for an ordinary DP it&#8217;s a pain.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d rate this camera at EI 800 with a highlight limit of 4 stops and shadows of 2 stops. Thats 6 stops beyond the chart DR.<br \/>I&#8217;d set the camera at 800 and my meter at 400 to get the best from this camera.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panasonic EVA<\/strong>: We recorded this on an Inferno in ProRes raw so you&#8217;re going to have to wait! what we can see looks good but what we see that is bad could be due to the post process.<\/p>\n<p><strong>RED Gemini<\/strong>: We used this camera with the 5&#8243; V\/F mounted on the front and it was easy to use and setup.<br \/>I&#8217;d rate this camera at EI 800 with highlight latitude of 3.5 stops and shadow latitude of 3 stops. That&#8217;s 6.5 stops beyond the charts DR.<br \/>I&#8217;d set both the camera and my meter at EI 800 to get the best from this camera<br \/>Note: The red chip\u00a0 at 25% clips as a hard orange at half a stop below maximum latitude so be careful with reds with this camera, overall I really like it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>RED Monstro<\/strong>: We had to stop for lunch to black shade this camera, it is very much the RED camera look that I don&#8217;t like.<br \/>I would rate the camera at EI 500 and highlights clip at 2.5 stops with shadows going at minus 2.5 stops.<br \/>That gives 5 stops beyond the DR of the charts.<br \/>Note: Reds and Yellow clip hard at plus 2 stops so the overall latitude is really 4.5 stops unless you&#8217;re very careful. I&#8217;ve had people say I could get better results in RedCine but this is a test on a level playing field.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sony Venice<\/strong>: It fires up quickly, changes modes quickly, has an easy menu, is compact and balanced.<br \/>I&#8217;d rate this camera at EI 400 with a latitude in the highlights of 4 stops and 2.5 in the shadows.<br \/>this is 6.5 stops beyond the DR of the charts.<br \/>I&#8217;d rate both the camera and my meter at EI 400 to get the best from this camera.<br \/>Note: The highlights clip slowly and smoothly and the colour is not that &#8220;Sony Look&#8221; it also has the most consistent colour across the exposure range.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, check out the raw files if you care about images\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/Digital-Cinematography-Camera-Evaluations-2018.html\">https\/\/cinematography.net\/Digital-Cinematography-Camera-Evaluations-2018.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I want to stress that these are purely personal impressions and that you should check out the raw files at\u00a0\u00a0https:\/cinematography.net\u00a0 and also get your hands on a camera to see how it feels for you before making any decisions.When we were shooting we used an Odyssey and a Canon 24&#8243; monitor to see what we &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/2018\/07\/30\/personal-comments-on-the-2018-cml-camera-evaluations\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Personal comments on the 2018 CML camera evaluations&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cameras"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8PwMD-3Q","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":316,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238\/revisions\/316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cinematography.net\/CineRant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}