I'm looking to add one or two Glimmerglass filters to my kit.
They're only available in potencies of # 1 thru # 5. From
Tiffen, I'm used to using 1/8, 1/4 & 1/2 whereas 1-5 is
generally to "mushy".
Does anyone have any thoughts regarding these filters....
and possibly some feedback on how to best describe the diffusion
qualities between #'s 1 thru 5?
Thanks...
Jack Cummings
Buffalo/DP
" I'm looking to add one or
two Glimmerglass filters to my kit."
I don't think I am familiar with the term. What's a Glimmerglass
filter?
Argyris Theos
DoP
Athens Greece
===============================================
www.tiffen.com/glimmerglass-pr.pdf
Duraid
> Does anyone have any thoughts
regarding these filters....
Yes. They are very nice. If you'd like I can send you stills
(JPEG) from a recently shot test that show the difference
in the grades. I have shot with these for print and for xfer
and found myself wishing I'd used the 2 and 3 rather than
the 1 and 2 and I like it pretty subtle. The 5 gets a bit
foggy and washes the shadows but still looks nice.
Best regards,
Anders Uhl
Cinematographer
ICG, New York
> I don't think I am familiar
with the term. What's a Glimmerglass filter?
Think of very fine glitter or shiny metallic specks in the
glass. Somewhat like a frost or mist filter but the diffusing
element is specular. It is a very new filter (made by Tiffen).
Best,
Anders Uhl
Cinematographer
ICG, New York
As an aside, I think Steven Poster recently made the comment
that when some of the more astute on camera talent sees the
sparkle of a Glimmerglass filter in the mattebox, they rest
a little easier knowing that they're being looked after..
Jack Cummings
Buffalo/DP
>As an aside, I think Steven
Poster recently made the comment that >when some of the more
astute on camera talent sees the sparkle of a >Glimmerglass
filter in the mattebox...
The story is that they were originally made for that very
reason. Something along the lines of dazzling with brilliance
or baffling with...
Best,
Anders Uhl
Cinematographer
ICG, New York
JLCummings writes :
>As an aside, I think Steven
Poster recently made the comment that >when some of the more
astute on camera talent sees the sparkle of a >Glimmerglass
filter in the mattebox, they rest a little easier knowing
that >they're being looked after..
Actually Ira will tell you that comment came from Bill Wages
in Atlanta.
Steven Poster ASC
Anders Uhl writes:
>The story is that they were
originally made for that very reason. >Something along the
lines of dazzling with brilliance or baffling with...
But they really work well.
Steven Poster ASC
Have you found a source for these filters ... some rental
houses are saying they are not yet available?
Mako, FilterFoto, Glendale, CA
Steven Poster wrote :
> But they really work well.
Yes they do.
Anders Uhl
Cinematographer
ICG, New York
Mako writes:
>Have you found a source for
these filters ... some rental houses are >saying they are not
yet available?
I can order them through my Tiffen dealer, Communiquip, in
Buffalo.
I'm finding that some grades are on backorder. I'm buying,
not renting...BTW.
Jack Cummings
Buffalo/DP
I have used the glass at Panavision in woodland hills. Its
nice on female skin that is already reflective. Its a taste
thing, no more special in my book than any other. Its a matter
of what you like. It comes in three different densities 1,
2, & 3. It kind of an enhancer and not really some weird
classic soft.
T.Upshaw
L.A. Cinematographer
Jack Cummings wrote:
>I'm interested in...Tiffen Glimmerglass...they're
available in potencies >of 1-5...whereas
I normally think in terms 1/8, 1/4, & 1/2
Glimmerglass was the brainchild of Bill Wages, ASC, who had
prototyped them a while back, and showed them to me a couple
of years ago. I made my own version, which he liked better,
and Bill then used them on a Mary Tyler Moore Christmas special
that aired about a year ago. Steven Poster got the next set
and has used them as well. Sending further test sets out to
others allowed us to learn what filter strengths were most
useful, and then we put the most often used grade in the middle
of the range and called it #3. As you'd expect, the #1 and
2 are somewhat weaker; the #4 and #5 are stronger. In this
manner, the full range becomes more often viable. It may take
some getting used to, but the numbering sequence is cleaner
and just as readily describes the relative strengths, without
resorting to fractions.
Fact is, our original numbering scheme for most of our effects
started out as 1-5, and then as time went on, weaker grades
become more important and we were asked to add what became
the fractionals. That may yet happen here, but we feel this
is a good place to start.
Ira Tiffen
The Tiffen Company
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Hi,
> Tiffen Glimmerglass...
Sorry if I'm asking a know-nothing newbie question, but exactly
what is the effect created by these filters?
Phil Rhodes
Video camera/edit
London
Phil Rhodes wrote:
>"Tiffen Glimmerglass...what is the effect created
by these filters?"
Phil,
You may recall when we met last February at the London hotel
where Geoff had a CML gathering, that I passed some of these
filters around.
The effect is that of improving people's appearance, through
a subtle combination of fine detail softening, minimizing
the appearance of wrinkles and blemishes without looking "soft-focus",
and mild contrast reduction with modest highlight flare. Probably
closest to, yet different from, the Pro-Mist range.
Glimmerglass has an additional psychological edge, as Steven
Poster pointed out. Bill Wages uses it this way: he sits down
with the talent prior to production, hands them the filter,
they look through it to see how good people look. He then
mentions that when they see it glittering, as Anders Uhl described,
on the front of the lens during filming, they can relax knowing
that he's "taking care of them," and they'll look
their best. And this sometimes helps with more confident performances.
Ira Tiffen
The Tiffen Company
Hauppauge, NY 11788
When I first heard of the Glimmerglass, I had hoped that they
actually caused a little sparkling in the image, like something
you saw in the 1930's production of "Midsummer Night's
Dream" -- but more subtle (they used some sequins on
a fine net in front of the lens, out-of-focus, for some shots.)
I was hoping for a filter that when you got a halation, there
would be a bit of a sparkling too.
David Mullen
Cinematographer / L.A.
David Mullen writes :
>I was hoping for a filter that
when you got a halation, there would be a bit >of a sparkling
too.
What if one removed the donut or otherwise opened up the rear
of the mattebox to backlight the filter? Would that create
the effect with Glimmerglass?
Could
be a cool effect.
Mitch Gross
NYC DP
Copyright © CML. All rights reserved.