We are currently completing some camera tests with the RED ONE camera running build 17 with the new hardware upgrade (S4i/Audio upgrade). What we have discovered is that camera is giving us a 64asa rating.
The camera is set up to 4k 16x9 @ 25 timebase, 1/50 shutter. The camera has been reset to factory default (look, user, system). An 18% gray card was placed in front of the camera, the RAW 'look' HDSDI was monitored on various waveform monitors and exposure was adjusted to 50%. Reflected readings were taken from multiple Sekonic and Minolta light meters - which indicated the same conclusion.
This was compared against the REC709 LUT, which was measuring at 250.....A slight change from build 16, which read at 160.I am very confused why this is happening. Is this a build 17 or hardware thing, or is there some sort of issue with what we are doing. Would be really interested to hear any similar experiences. Cheers, Rob Morton
There is little difference between Build 16, 17 and 18 in terms of Image. Most of the improvements are menu, protocol, and port configs.I personally wouldn't judge a 18% Card off a HD-SDI monitor because what your truly looking at is a RAW image at Rec709. The Tap compresses the signal in addition to the live debayer can color shift from camera to camera.
Are you using RedAlert at all?
Based off my tests I've gotten 160 asa off a 18% Grey card, which hasn't changed since B16. There is an inherent issue with metering RAW de-bayer camera's like HD/Video cameras the results aren't the same.Good luck, Dane Brehm
There've been a number of people who say that you can't judge the ASA of the camera by placing the histogram at 50% on a waveform because effective speed has more to do with acceptable noise level than where middle gray falls on a waveform. Still, when working outside, I've found that my meter matches up with the exposure I set using the camera's tools most closely at 160--so that's what I light to, and I set the exposure separately using the histograms.If you go by RedSpace or Rec709 and use the same method you'll end up at 160. Raw mode is darker than the other modes, as there's less gamma being applied, so I wouldn't go by that. I usually shoot in RedSpace, with one of the user buttons set to toggle into raw mode just to see what's really clipping. I won't say the camera is ASA 320, but it's also not ASA 64. I vote for 160-250. Art Adams | dp
Would you set a film camera's exposure based on the video tap's output? Equally inaccurate to what you are doing.Mitch Gross
What output mode did you use exactly? "View Raw" ?Because question is : what's exactly the "view raw" output on the red camera? Antoine Baumann
View Raw is a user menu designation for your user keys to toggle between Look Up Tables the choices are Rec709, Redpspace or RAW. This also brings up the histogram or rgb parade on the GUI.The best "view raw" output on the Red is the EVF. The problem is they tend to wig out and solarise after a while. I had 6 Asa settings I would toggle between with the DP and Gaffer. All according to DP Dan Stoloffs and I discussions about acceptable noise and color. I did most of these via RedAlert with a LUT. 2600kelvin @ 500 asa is not the best image I've seen but worked for the story and the character of lighting.
Dane Brehm wrote:>>“Daylight Cloudy - 160asa@6500k
These are primarily for Dailies or the Offline Edit. Those are the light meter settings for the DP and Gaffer.
We all understand its 320@5000k anyways. I do understand that your thinking of a on-set practice, where you set your meter at 500asa to protect your highlights.
It's tricky, because when I expose in full sun according to zebras, the stop on the lens matches my meter at 160. In backlight, though, it's a different ball game, because when using film I could let highlights blow, whereas I can't let that slide on the RED quite as easily. That's why I only rely on my meter for lighting for the RED, not exposing.The higher ASA under tungsten light makes sense in that you want to keep red from clipping prematurely, but I'm not happy about the noise levels at higher ASA's. Filters like the Schneider CTB's or 80C or 80D can reign in red but at the expense of exposure, as you're passing all the blue light but blocking a lot of the red and green. Mike Fecik at Tiffen had an interesting idea: why not use a CC20C or CC30C filter instead? Cyan would pass both blue and green, meaning less light loss, while reigning in red. I don't know that anyone locally has any CC filters, but if someone elsewhere does and wants to try them I'd be curious if they extended the RED's latitude under tungsten light without as much of an exposure compensation requirement. Art Adams | dp
Mike Fecik at Tiffen had an interesting idea: why not use a CC20C or CC30C filter instead?
Never really? thought of those, I have a Red job next week that I can try it on. I'll post any tests I do.
CML has just published the "Little RED Book"
This book is an edited collection of conversation's during 2009 about ways to use the RED one and how to get around any problems you may encounter.
Impress others with your knowledge!
Be the envy of your friends!
Buy it today!
Available as an A5 book or a PDF if you just can't wait!
© copyright CML all rights reserved