Hi there,
I will be shooting a film in January on the Red One that is going to be 99.9999 percent hand held. I am of strong physique and I do not intent to change that. I am looking for advise for a well balanced shoulder/held hand rig for the Red One available for rent in Ukland. The subject has been discussed here a short while ago and sillililly didn't take any notes...!
Hi Nic
>
I have just finished shooting a film with the RED ONE , instead of using a rig for hand held I used easy rig it is very nice balanced , It was a great solution you should try it and practice a bit , I believe you are going to like it . I'm sending you a link www.easyrig.com
>
Giora Bejach
www.bejach.com
>
Nic you can search on the website interface but anyway......
I just shot 2 * 90 minute TV films, Wallander, with totally hand-held RED’s.
I was lucky enough to get an early model Element Technica shoulder mount and I would now refuse to do a shoot without it!!
It’s totally adjustable for tilt, rotation, balance etc, for once a shoulder mount that fits YOUR shoulder and not one that you have to put up with.
We did have an Easy Rig but they really compromise where you can put the camera so it was ruled out immediately.
I’m not fit, I used to do a huge amount of hand held but that was a long time ago, I hadn’t operated HH for years when this job came up!!
Actually, I hadn’t operated much for years. The ERT rig wasn’t available for the first few weeks and I suffered various aches and pains, these vanished completely when I got a properly balanced camera. ET has some stills of me with the camera on my shoulder and my hands well away from it, the camera was just sitting there without any assistance at all. Ah the Easy-Rig- or as we have come to call it on my current job "The Fishing Suit"...
Not the answer to every problem but worth checking out.
But beware the grip on it does not lock satisfactorily on to the Red One. Lost the camera one day in the first week. It just dropped in to my lap. Need to keep an eye on that. Had a very nervous grip for about a month after that...
>> ET has some stills of me with the camera on my shoulder and my hands well away from it, the >>camera was just sitting there without any assistance at all.
Any chance they could post some? It would be nice to see what this rig is like. Why aren't they promoting it at their site? David Perrault, CSC>>"But beware the grip on it does not lock satisfactorily on to the Red One. Lost the camera one day >>in the first week."
One solution to this that we used successfully on a recent job was to dismantle the top handle on the Red and slide the rubber grip off entirely. This allowed the Easy Rig to grip quite nicely. I wasn't the one to do the dismantling so not sure how involved it was but it didn't take too long. Norman Bonneyruairi o'brien wrote:
>> But beware the grip on it does not lock satisfactorily on to the Red One. Lost the camera one day in >>the first week... When shooting with the easyrig use a "frog". If anyone needs an illustration let me know I can email a picture. Cheers Emmanuel, from sunny Beirut, LebanonRuairi O’Brien wrote:
>> But beware the grip on it does not lock satisfactorily on to the Red One. Lost the camera one day in >>the first week...
Hi all,I shot a recent feature entirely hand held with the RED ("Toe to Toe", in competition @ Sundance 2009), and relied very heavily on the Easy Rig. In my case, this was to be able to under-sling the camera at eye- level to my teenage leads (I'm rather tall). The Easy rig allowed me to HH the cam at chest height all day long with very good support. I also benefited from some extra-long 19mm rods, which, extended out 6 inches from the back of camera, allowed me to "hook" my upper arm around the back of the cam (we had to jury-rig a button shield for the rear console) for very solid, "full-body" control. I have pictures of this uniquely effective arrangement if anyone needs to "shoot from the nip"
But yes, as Ruairi mentioned, beware the Easy Rig hook can slide off of the end of the RED top Handle, especially at extreme up/down tilts. We used the RED top handle "extension" piece that bridges to the rear top plate, closing the gap and preventing a fall. Extreme The EVF is essential, in my opinion, for effective HH control. I found that I would unintentionally "Dutch" shots when framing via the LCD, as it is difficult to keep the LCD nicely square to camera.
No affiliation with Easy Rig, other than wishing I had bought one before renting its purchase price many times over. Hope this helps, Alan JacobsenJeff wrote:
>>ET has some stills of me with the camera on my shoulder and my hands well away from it, the >>camera was just sitting there without any assistance at all.
>>This is the way to good hand held shooting.
Check the Rodney Charters review about the RED on http://www.reel-show.tv/
best, Jean-Marc FERRIERE, DP/Cinematographer, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.class="style17" >> I am trying to figure out if I can make the RED work like a "standard shoulder mount rig" camera. >>IE, the 3700 or any other camera with that shape and function.
I have used the RedOne like an ENG camera many times. It can be done. The biggest issue for me vs a camera like the 3700 is not the body, it’s the ergonomics of a modern B4 video lens vs Cine glass.
With a proper hand grip on the lens, the shoulder shooting position with a well balanced ENG rig is pretty nice for an experienced operator with the ability to rack focus (on the barrel), zoom and walk the iris all at the same time. This is possible because the right hand can handle the rig while the left hand does the rest. Try that with an Optimo . My suggestion is this. Get the Red, outfit it with: ET shoulder mount, the Red 18-85mm zoom (good value for the dollar at around $10K) and FIZ motors from View Factor integrated into the front handles.>>The real answer is for Fujinon, Canon, Zeiss or Angie to build a PL mount lens with the operational >>conveniences of a modern B4 video lens for the RedOne.
I'm sure it's been asked and answered on RedUser, but will the Red One survive the onslaught of new modulars? I assumed looking at the proposed catalog that the One would be discontinued since it's market position is pretty well covered (and I have to admit, I find the roadmap much more attractive than the current offering). And that here on out third parties would be much more interested in supporting them. But in the context of a lens, I'd suppose that what would work for One would probably work for the other. Tim Sassoon>> The real answer is for Fujinon, Canon, Zeiss or Angie to build a PL mount lens with the >>operational conveniences of a modern B4 video lens for the RedOne.
Since Red has been out for quite a while now, and that hasn't happened, the conclusion has to be drawn that such a venture would not be profitable. In fact, most lenses from those manufacturers cost more than the Red, and although some of those manufacturers do not how to cut costs to accommodate cheaper cameras (witness the lenses for the 1/2" chip Sony’s, which were quite inexpensive), the resulting lenses are also not very good. Bob Kertesz>>although some of those manufacturers do not how to cut costs
That should have been "do KNOW how to cut costs" of course... Bob Kertesz
Copyright © CML. All rights reserved.